Is COVID19 a Pandemic of Disease or is it a Pandemic of PCR Testing?
In 2020-21 for the first time in history global populations are being screened with a RT-PCR test to diagnose a new flu-like illness that has been labelled COVID19 disease. This is a problem for two reasons i) the test cannot diagnose disease; it only identifies segments of viral material and ii) healthy people are now being considered ‘cases’ of disease simply by testing positive to this test that cannot diagnose disease.
This has resulted in thousands of ‘cases’ of this disease being reported in the media even though these cases do not have any symptoms of disease. These cases of healthy people are being described as a ‘pandemic’ of a new disease and they are being used by the media to frighten the public about a new strain of a coronavirus: a virus that causes the common cold.
In addition, the increased number of healthy people with a positive test (many false positives are occurring – >40%) are the sole reason why the Australian government has adopted emergency powers to implement draconian measures to control this alleged ‘serious outbreak’ of disease. The fact that healthy people are now considered cases of disease could be the reason why COVID19 is the only infectious disease on the government’s communicable disease website that does not have a case definition for the disease.
This new disease has not been killing people in greater numbers than the normal flu viruses, yet the government has locked up healthy people, forced them to take an invasive PCR test that carries a risk of infections and forced people to wear masks that suppresses the oxygen supply during any activity. In Western Australia people who do not comply with these directives face criminal charges.
The screening of the population with PCR testing is resulting in healthy people being classified as cases of disease and the government’s solution to these ‘cases’ is to make the healthy population sick and anxious with measures that would only be necessary if there was real evidence of a virus that was causing serious illness and deaths in the general population in Australia.
It is important to have evidence of this fact in our own country, not from other countries, because we have a different healthcare system and environment to other countries. But this evidence has never been provided by the Australian government.
It has not been provided because it is the first time in history that a ‘pandemic’ has been declared based only on a mathematical model (using false assumptions) and an increase in ‘cases’ and not an increase in serious illness and deaths in the general population. This situation has also been created because the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suspended the tracking of influenza for the 2020-21 flu season.
Hence, it is possible that much of the illness that is being labelled as COVID19 in 2020-21 could be influenza because the diagnosis is being made based only on ‘suspected’ cases without determining if the virus is present in every case/death. This is important because there are many infectious and non-infectious causes of flu-like illness.
This manufactured situation has allowed governments to introduce an experimental COVID19 vaccine into the Australian population before the safety and efficacy trials have been completed. The government is currently organising digital e-passports for every Australian even though it has stated that the vaccine will be voluntary. Yet many Australians are already penalised with coercive vaccination for 16 other vaccines and it is possible that the new COVID19 vaccine could be used in a similar way.
Genetics is the most important factor in the health outcomes of any disease, and this makes the removal of choice in vaccination in healthy populations a crime against humanity. It is imperative to stop the PCR testing and this will stop healthy people from being labelled as cases of disease and the pandemic will be over.
Judy Wilyman has been studying the vaccination topic both formally and informally since 1993 when she vaccinated her first child. Like most people questioning vaccines, she has not come from an anti-vaccination position and the debate is not about pro- or anti-vaccination. It is about the safety, efficacy and necessity for each vaccine on the schedule. Are they all safe? And are they all effective and necessary?
In 2015 she completed a PhD at the University of Wollongong answering these questions. Her thesis is titled ‘A critical analysis of the Australian Government’s rationale for its vaccination policy.’ In Chapter 7 she presents a discussion of the claims made by the government about the safety and efficacy of vaccines that are not supported by scientific evidence.
Judy’s book that is based on her PhD research titled “Australia’s Loss of Health Freedom” is now available to buy.https://www.vaccinationdecisions.net/donate/
Read more about Dr Judy Wilyman on her website
https://consciouslivingmagazine.com.au/event/the-loss-of-health-freedom-our-genetics-and-coercive-vaccination/
